I write about data centres, power, and the capital that builds them — from inside the deals, not the press release.
Reports, ghostwritten thought leadership and due-diligence memos for infrastructure funds, data-centre developers, neoclouds and the trade press. Written from primary material: filings, contracts, interconnect data, vendor documentation. Handed back in the voice you publish in.
Seven samples
What a GPU data-centre financing actually looks like, and where the numbers break
Five structural problems that recur in lender-side technical due diligence, and why a term sheet that clears at the model stage turns into a list of conditions precedent.
Read sample →The questions a lender should ask before financing an AI data-centre build
Fifteen questions in the format a credit committee already reads: offtake, delivery, power, structure. What to ask, and what the answer has to contain.
Read sample →Why we passed on fourteen data-centre deals in eighteen months
A fund principal's argument for discipline, in their own voice. This is the ghostwriting demonstration: a view that is not mine, written as though it were.
Read sample →Investment committee memorandum: Project Kestrel
What a lender reads before committing to a 180 MW GPU campus: red flags graded by severity, a three-outcome view, conditions precedent, and the four assumptions the deal actually rests on.
Read sample →An executive LinkedIn series, and a podcast episode adapted into an article
Four posts for a fund principal, a transcript turned into a published article with the edit decisions shown, and the workflow that makes a 26-episode season survivable. Fictional speaker, labelled throughout.
Read sample →Who is actually lending against what: a $19 billion lease, a $3.5 to $4.0 billion shell, and a Google backstop that starts late
A reading of TeraWulf's 4 November 2026 filings: what the headline number measures, what the landlord is building, what the contractor carries, and when the hyperscaler backstop actually switches on. Every figure attributed.
Read sample →Power-list entries: three people who moved the money in AI infrastructure
Three entries written to a power list's real specification: 150–200 words each, every claim hyperlinked to a filing, a release or a call transcript, with the method note an editor can check. CoreWeave, SoftBank and Blue Owl.
Read sample →What I write
| Research-led reports | Sector or deal-specific research from primary sources. 1,500–4,000 words with exhibits. LP letters, market-entry cases, board packs, gated content. |
| Ghostwritten thought leadership | Partner, founder or fund-lead bylines: LinkedIn posts, op-eds, newsletter essays, conference speeches. I interview the principal, extract the actual view, and write it in their voice. |
| Due-diligence memos | Commercial and technical due diligence in the format credit committees and ICs already read: red flags graded by severity, a three-outcome view, assumptions listed with what evidence exists and what does not. |
Rates
| Standard writing | $0.35 / word |
| Ghostwritten byline, 800–1,200 words, one revision round | $0.35 / word |
| Deal memo — 1,500 words, IC format | $1,200 |
| Sector primer — 2,500 words plus three exhibits | $2,000 |
| Lender or investor pack — 3,500–4,000 words plus exhibits | $3,500 |
| Retainer — four pieces per month, two revision rounds each | $2,000 / month |
| Rush, under 72 hours | +50% |
50% on start, 50% on delivery for new clients; net 14 thereafter. Research beyond desk sources (data-room review, expert calls) quoted separately.
Background
Strategy and finance consultant. At Altman Solon, the strategy firm dedicated to technology, media and telecom, I did lender-side technical and commercial due diligence on data-centre and digital-infrastructure financings, including a multi-billion-dollar NVIDIA GPU data-centre debt raise: GPU cluster design against reference architecture, offtake and service levels, acceptance criteria, tranche delivery. B.S.B.A. in Business Analytics, Bucknell University.
That is the reason to hire me rather than a generalist: I have read the acceptance schedule and I have sat in the credit committee, so I know which sentence in the memo the lender actually argues with.
Engage
Send the brief, the audience, the length and the deadline. I reply with a scope and a price within one business day, and I do not start until scope is agreed.
cromei223@gmail.com
linkedin.com/in/christopher-romei-473790282
No invented statistics. No byline under anyone else's name without their review. No client names in anything public. Anything illustrative is labelled as illustrative.